![]() It is poorly organized, and a bit confusing. The only negative aspect of the Marantz is the Owner's Manual. I have been unable to find anything I want on DVD-A. Unfortunately I have yet to test the DVD-A playback. I then listened to some Bob Dylan and David Bowie and found that they also sounded much nicer. ![]() Not only was the sound much cleaner and warmer, but the 5.1 mix gives you a completely new experience. My first test was with Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon. I can hear things in movie soundtracks that I never knew were there.Īs for the SACD playback, I was very impressed at how much nicer the SACD format sounds when compared to CD. But, I suppose maybe that is the case when you go from a low end product to mid-range product.Īlso, I found that the Marantz sent a much cleaner digital signal to my Yamaha receiver. The Sony showed no difference at all between Composite, S-Video, and Component Video. Because the video output on the Marantz was of much higher quality, I was able to see how the defective cable had been distorting the picture. ![]() ![]() The picture quality from the Marantz is much higher than the Sony, so much so that I discovered I had a defective Component Video cable. I bought this unit as a replacement for my cheap Sony DVP-NS415, and I am very glad I did the difference is incredible.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |